Popularity
1.1
Growing
Activity
1.1
-
12
1
0

Programming language: Go
License: MIT License
Tags: Data Structures    

cmap alternatives and similar packages

Based on the "Data Structures" category.
Alternatively, view cmap alternatives based on common mentions on social networks and blogs.

Do you think we are missing an alternative of cmap or a related project?

Add another 'Data Structures' Package

Popular Comparisons

SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Sponsored www.saashub.com

README

cmap Build Status GoDoc codecov Go Report Card

The map type in Go doesn't support concurrent reads and writes. cmap(concurrent-map) provides a high-performance solution to this by sharding the map with minimal time spent waiting for locks.

The sync.Map has a few key differences from this map. The stdlib sync.Map is designed for append-only scenarios. So if you want to use the map for something more like in-memory db, you might benefit from using our version. You can read more about it in the golang repo, for example here and here

Here we fork some README document from concurrent-map

usage

Import the package:

import (
    "github.com/lrita/cmap"
)


go get "github.com/lrita/cmap"

The package is now imported under the "cmap" namespace.

example


    // Create a new map.
    var m cmap.Cmap

    // Stores item within map, sets "bar" under key "foo"
    m.Store("foo", "bar")

    // Retrieve item from map.
    if tmp, ok := m.Load("foo"); ok {
        bar := tmp.(string)
    }

    // Deletes item under key "foo"
    m.Delete("foo")

benchmark

goos: darwin
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/lrita/cmap
BenchmarkLoadMostlyHits/*cmap_test.DeepCopyMap-4            50000000            34.5 ns/op
BenchmarkLoadMostlyHits/*cmap_test.RWMutexMap-4             20000000            65.2 ns/op
BenchmarkLoadMostlyHits/*sync.Map-4                         50000000            34.8 ns/op
BenchmarkLoadMostlyHits/*cmap.Cmap-4                        30000000            53.5 ns/op
BenchmarkLoadMostlyMisses/*cmap_test.DeepCopyMap-4          50000000            26.7 ns/op
BenchmarkLoadMostlyMisses/*cmap_test.RWMutexMap-4           20000000            62.5 ns/op
BenchmarkLoadMostlyMisses/*sync.Map-4                       50000000            22.7 ns/op
BenchmarkLoadMostlyMisses/*cmap.Cmap-4                      30000000            40.3 ns/op
--- SKIP: BenchmarkLoadOrStoreBalanced/*cmap_test.DeepCopyMap
    cmap_bench_test.go:91: DeepCopyMap has quadratic running time.
BenchmarkLoadOrStoreBalanced/*cmap_test.RWMutexMap-4         3000000           437 ns/op
BenchmarkLoadOrStoreBalanced/*sync.Map-4                     3000000           546 ns/op
BenchmarkLoadOrStoreBalanced/*cmap.Cmap-4                    3000000           497 ns/op
--- SKIP: BenchmarkLoadOrStoreUnique/*cmap_test.DeepCopyMap
    cmap_bench_test.go:123: DeepCopyMap has quadratic running time.
BenchmarkLoadOrStoreUnique/*cmap_test.RWMutexMap-4           2000000           990 ns/op
BenchmarkLoadOrStoreUnique/*sync.Map-4                       1000000          1032 ns/op
BenchmarkLoadOrStoreUnique/*cmap.Cmap-4                      2000000           892 ns/op
BenchmarkLoadOrStoreCollision/*cmap_test.DeepCopyMap-4      100000000           18.2 ns/op
BenchmarkLoadOrStoreCollision/*cmap_test.RWMutexMap-4       10000000           165 ns/op
BenchmarkLoadOrStoreCollision/*sync.Map-4                   100000000           19.6 ns/op
BenchmarkLoadOrStoreCollision/*cmap.Cmap-4                  20000000            65.7 ns/op
BenchmarkRange/*cmap_test.DeepCopyMap-4                       200000          8646 ns/op
BenchmarkRange/*cmap_test.RWMutexMap-4                         20000         62046 ns/op
BenchmarkRange/*sync.Map-4                                    200000          9317 ns/op
BenchmarkRange/*cmap.Cmap-4                                    50000         31107 ns/op
BenchmarkAdversarialAlloc/*cmap_test.DeepCopyMap-4           2000000           531 ns/op
BenchmarkAdversarialAlloc/*cmap_test.RWMutexMap-4           20000000            74.3 ns/op
BenchmarkAdversarialAlloc/*sync.Map-4                        5000000           390 ns/op
BenchmarkAdversarialAlloc/*cmap.Cmap-4                      30000000            53.6 ns/op
BenchmarkAdversarialDelete/*cmap_test.DeepCopyMap-4          5000000           273 ns/op
BenchmarkAdversarialDelete/*cmap_test.RWMutexMap-4          20000000            94.4 ns/op
BenchmarkAdversarialDelete/*sync.Map-4                      10000000           137 ns/op
BenchmarkAdversarialDelete/*cmap.Cmap-4                     30000000            43.3 ns/op