goctx alternatives and similar packages
Based on the "Utilities" category.
Alternatively, view goctx alternatives based on common mentions on social networks and blogs.
-
xlsx
Library to simplify reading the XML format used by recent version of Microsoft Excel in Go programs. -
goreporter
A Golang tool that does static analysis, unit testing, code review and generate code quality report. -
go-funk
A modern Go utility library which provides helpers (map, find, contains, filter, chunk, reverse, ...) -
mc
Minio Client provides minimal tools to work with Amazon S3 compatible cloud storage and filesystems. -
mergo
A helper to merge structs and maps in Golang. Useful for configuration default values, avoiding messy if-statements. -
beaver
Beaver is a real-time messaging server. With beaver you can easily build scalable in-app notifications, realtime graphs, multiplayer games, chat applications, geotracking and more in web applications and mobile apps. -
httpcontrol
Package httpcontrol allows for HTTP transport level control around timeouts and retries.
Get performance insights in less than 4 minutes
Do you think we are missing an alternative of goctx or a related project?
Popular Comparisons
README
goctx
Get your context value faster
How to use
Replace
v := ctx.Value(key)
With
v := goctx.Value(ctx, key)
Benchmark
There will be little difference when there is only 1~2 context.WithXXX
calls
With 5 context.WithXXX
calls
BenchmarkValue/5/non_parallel/std-8 | 35313684 | 34.2 ns/op |
BenchmarkValue/5/non_parallel/goctx-8 | 42801348 | 30.0 ns/op |
BenchmarkValue/5/non_parallel/pure_map-8 | 16655377 | 72.8 ns/op |
BenchmarkValue/5/parallel/std-8 | 168420460 | 7.09 ns/op |
BenchmarkValue/5/parallel/goctx-8 | 185695462 | 6.35 ns/op |
BenchmarkValue/5/parallel/pure_map-8 | 67944997 | 17.6 ns/op |
With 20 context.WithXXX
calls
BenchmarkValue/20/non_parallel/std-8 | 7137338 | 168 ns/op |
BenchmarkValue/20/non_parallel/goctx-8 | 14623730 | 81.4 ns/op |
BenchmarkValue/20/non_parallel/pure_map-8 | 5282458 | 235 ns/op |
BenchmarkValue/20/parallel/std-8 | 42826857 | 27.9 ns/op |
BenchmarkValue/20/parallel/goctx-8 | 79149823 | 15.1 ns/op |
BenchmarkValue/20/parallel/pure_map-8 | 22206717 | 53.8 ns/op |
As we can see from the benchmark test, the map implementation is slower than the
standard one, so it is not recommended to use RegisterValueFunc
to register a
context value function, unless you do not want to see nested stack with Value
method
call (That's also the reason why RegisterValueFunc
is kept even it is not fast)