utp alternatives and related packages

Based on the "Networking" category

• kcptun

  9.8 8.4 utp VS kcptun

  An extremely simple & fast udp tunnel based on KCP protocol

• fasthttp

  9.7 8.3 utp VS fasthttp

  Package fasthttp is a fast HTTP implementation for Go, up to 10 times faster than net/http

• dns

  9.2 8.8 utp VS dns

  Go library for working with DNS

• httpstat

  9.1 2.8 utp VS httpstat

  It's like curl -v, with colours.

• gopacket

  9.0 8.7 utp VS gopacket

  A Go library for packet processing with libpcap bindings

• kcp-go

  8.7 8.8 utp VS kcp-go

  KCP

• gobgp

  8.5 8.9 utp VS gobgp

  BGP implemented in the Go Programming Language.

• gobetween

  7.7 7.4 utp VS gobetween

  Modern & minimalistic load balancer for the Сloud era

• mqttPaho

  7.6 6.4 utp VS mqttPaho

  The Paho Go Client provides an MQTT client library for connection to MQTT brokers via TCP, TLS or WebSockets.

• ssh

  7.6 4.6 utp VS ssh

  Higher-level API for building SSH servers (wraps crypto/ssh).

• sftp

  7.4 5.6 utp VS sftp

  Package sftp implements the SSH File Transfer Protocol as described in https://filezilla-project.org/specs/draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-02.txt.

• water

  7.3 5.9 utp VS water

  A simple TUN/TAP library

• go-getter

  7.2 8.5 utp VS go-getter

  A Go library for downloading files or directories from various sources using a URL.

• mdns

  7.2 2.9 utp VS mdns

  Simple mDNS (Multicast DNS) client/server library in Golang

• fortio

  7.0 6.7 utp VS fortio

  Load testing library and command line tool and web UI. Allows to specify a set query-per-second load and record latency histograms and other useful stats and graph them.

• NFF-Go

  7.0 8.1 utp VS NFF-Go

  Framework for rapid development of performant network functions for cloud and bare-metal.

• ftp

  6.9 6.0 utp VS ftp

  Package ftp implements a FTP client as described in RFC 959.

• gosnmp

  6.9 7.7 utp VS gosnmp

  Native Go library for performing SNMP actions

• lhttp

  6.8 0.0 utp VS lhttp

  A powerful websocket framework, build your IM server more easily.

• gotcp

  6.7 0.0 utp VS gotcp

  A Go package for quickly writing tcp applications

• grab

  6.5 5.5 utp VS grab

  Go package for managing file downloads

• gopcap

  6.4 0.0 utp VS gopcap

  A Go wrapper for libpcap

• tcp_server

  6.0 2.8 utp VS tcp_server

  A Go library for building tcp servers faster.

• go-stun

  5.8 0.7 utp VS go-stun

  A go implementation of the STUN client (RFC 3489 and RFC 5389).

• cidranger

  5.8 0.0 utp VS cidranger

  Fast IP to CIDR lookup for Go.

• raw

  5.6 5.3 utp VS raw

  Package raw enables reading and writing data at the device driver level for a network interface.

• winrm

  5.5 2.6 utp VS winrm

  A Go WinRM client to remotely execute commands on Windows machines

• stun

  5.4 8.4 utp VS stun

  Go implementation of RFC 5389 STUN protocol.

• buffstreams

  5.3 0.0 utp VS buffstreams

  Streaming protocolbuffer data over TCP made easy

• ethernet

  4.9 1.9 utp VS ethernet

  Package ethernet implements marshaling and unmarshaling of IEEE 802.3 Ethernet II frames and IEEE 802.1Q VLAN tags.

• canopus

  4.9 0.0 utp VS canopus

  CoAP Client/Server implementation (RFC 7252)

• arp

  4.8 2.1 utp VS arp

  Package arp implements the ARP protocol, as described in RFC 826.

• sslb

  4.3 3.7 utp VS sslb

  It's a Super Simples Load Balancer, just a little project to achieve some kind of performance.

• jazigo

  4.2 1.0 utp VS jazigo

  Jazigo is a tool written in Go for retrieving configuration for multiple network devices.

• xtcp

  3.9 2.5 utp VS xtcp

  A TCP Server Framework with simultaneous full duplex communication,graceful shutdown,custom protocol.

• VncProxy

  3.7 4.6 utp VS VncProxy

  An RFB proxy, written in go that can save and replay FBS files

• dhcp6

  3.6 3.3 utp VS dhcp6

  Package dhcp6 implements a DHCPv6 server, as described in RFC 3315.

• graval

  3.1 0.0 utp VS graval

  An experimental FTP server framework.

• ether

  2.8 0.0 utp VS ether

  A cross-platform Go package for sending and receiving ethernet frames.

• portproxy

  2.6 0.0 utp VS portproxy

  Simple TCP proxy which adds CORS support to API's which don't support it.

• linkio

  2.5 0.0 utp VS linkio

  Network link speed simulation for Reader/Writer interfaces

• golibwireshark

  1.5 0.0 utp VS golibwireshark

  Package golibwireshark use libwireshark library to decode pcap file and analyse dissection data.

• publicip

  1.4 0.0 utp VS publicip

  Package publicip returns your public facing IPv4 address (internet egress).

• go-digest-request

  1.2 0.0 utp VS go-digest-request

  request with digest authentication in golang

• goshark

  1.0 0.0 utp VS goshark

  Package goshark use tshark to decode IP packet and create data struct to analyse packet.

• netx

  0.9 2.6 utp VS netx

  Semantic addressing extention for golang's net package

• llb

  0.7 0.0 utp VS llb

  It's a very simple but quick backend for proxy servers. Can be useful for fast redirection to predefined domain with zero memory allocation and fast response.

Do you think we are missing an alternative of utp or a related project?

utp Recommendations

Have you used utp? Share your experience. Write a short recommendation and utp, you and your project will be promoted on Awesome Go.
Recommend utp

Recently added utp resources

Trace real requests from end-to-end to identify bottlenecks and errors. Try Datadog APM for free. More from our partner

Popular Comparisons

• utp
  vs
  kcp-go
• utp
  vs
  dns
• utp
  vs
  ssh
• utp
  vs
  go-stun
• utp
  vs
  arp

SaaSHub - The independent software marketplace. Find the best software and alternatives. More from our team